The Argument Against the Existence of God Essay

The Argument Against the Existence of idol - Essay ExampleThe theologizer embraces three propositions - God is omnipotent, God is good and wrong exists. Mackies brilliant argument for the caper of evil has shown that the first two propositions cannot be authorized while the third exists. He has made use of two additional premises to drive the blame home. He calls these quasi-logical rules connecting the terms good, evil, and omnipotent (Mackie 78). These additional propositions state that good is in a state of opposition with evil and seeks to eliminate it and that omnipotence is without limits. Therefore Mackies argument and the problem of evil has decimated the very core of theistic belief by claiming that the several parts of the essential theological article of faith are in tenacious with one another, so that the theologian can maintain his position as a building block only by a some(prenominal) more extreme rejection of reason (Mackie 77). Thus his argument calls for a complete reconstruction of the theological doctrine as we know it.At the onset Mackie outlines certain adequate solutions to the problem of evil that is also consistent with the essential theistic propositions or which rejects one or more of the propositions. He makes it clear that only those who deliberate that God is omnipotent and wholly good are confounded by this problem. ... Mackie then turns his attention to quadruplet solutions that he calls fallacious because they overtly adhere to the integral theological propositions while inadvertently or covertly rejecting one or more of them while attempting to tackle the problem of evil. The first of these fallacious solutions is that it is not achievable for good to exist without evil. Mackie asserts that this solution does explain a direction the presence of evil but a whole series of problems crop up consequently. For instance it questions Gods omnipotence because it implies that God cannot create one without the other and is in variably confine by the rules of logic. Further this solution undermines Gods goodness as it appears that God is not opposed to evil if it is deemed necessary. Besides, the real evil is far in excess of the amount needed to serve as a specified counterpart to good.Some people claim that evil is necessary as a means to good. This positioning according to Mackie contradicts the theists view of Gods omnipotence as it suggests that Gods power is subject to the law of cause and effect. Therefore this argument as seen by Mackie does not hold much water as it severely detracts from Gods omnipotence. The third solution to the problem of evil is that the world with its attendant evil is a better place than one without. By way of explanation Mackie classifies good and evil into levels. He calls pain and other forms of physical discomfiture first set out evils whereas pleasure constitutes first order good. First order evil is necessary to bring out blink of an eye order goods like benevo lence, courage, fortitude and the like which far outweighs first order evils. But Mackie states that this argument fall apart as it does not take into